Why criticize Lars Vilks and praise M.F. Hussain?

I really wonder if M.F. Hussain can really get the sort of freedom for expression in Qatar, a Muslim country. Why is everybody so worried if he accepts Qatari citizenship? Have people forgotten that he’s the same person who had painted Indian gods in nude? Creative expression is good and no one should forget that no other country has been as liberal as India. It’s true that India is a democratic country and there is freedom for expression. But that freedom should not insult and hurt others. When a person expresses himself through the medium of art, it reflexes his/her mind.

In one of the paintings of Mahatma Gandhi, Karl Marx, Albert Einstein and Hitler, Hussain had painted only Hitler nude and had said his way of humiliating a person is to paint him nude. So according to him, is it his way of humiliating Hindu Goddesses by painting them nude?

Why paint only Hindu Gods and Goddesses in nude? Paint some Islamic heroes also in nude and see the reaction. Why can’t he paint a woman in nude and give her a Islamic name instead of Hindu name and see the reaction of the world?

A mere writing of a book landed Salman Rushdie and Taslima Nasreen in the soup. And what will happen to Hussain if he paints Islamic persons in nude? If he paints someone in nude there, will he be able to retain Qatari citizenship?

There should be freedom of expression, but one should know the limits of his freedom. We can’t paint our mother or sisters in nude, for we respect them. We respect woman and we will never ever want to humiliate her.

Did people keep quiet when Swedish cartoonist Lars Vilks published a cartoon of Prophet Mohammed’s head on the body of a dog in a 2007 Swedish newspaper editorial on freedom of expression? As many as seven people, nationals from Algeria, Libya, the Palestinian territories, Croatia and the US, have been arrested so far for trying to kill the cartoonist. Not just that, in 2007, a group linked to al-Qaeda in Iraq offered a $100,000 (£66,000) reward for killing Vilks, and a 50% bonus if he was slaughtered like a lamb by having his throat cut.

When the world saw the anger of Muslims across the world for painting the prophet in the cartoon, why can’t they digest the anger of Hindus over Hussain painting Goddesses in nude? What kind of secularism is this? What kind of justice and freedom of expression is this? Why criticize only Lars Vilks and praise M.F. Hussain?

  1. Avinash Jayaram says:

    ..paintning is an art.. an art could look good to one person… and interesting to other.. and .. vulgar to some other… every painting can be given a meaning.. and paintings.. which this hussain ‘does’ can be done.. by any poster maker.. or even kids.. who has not seen schools.. only difference is hussain’s desire.. is seen in his painting.. …

    .. .point I want to make here is.. ‘khuda meherban to gadha pehalvaan’.. he is not at all a painter.. his followers who don’t know what is painting.. like him.. give publicity.. and if publicity can gain profit from a senseless story of a movie.. then hussain is not a big deal !..

    .. as an Indian like hussain has the right of expression…. All Indians have the right of expression.. and lets express our thoughts for hussain..

Leave a Reply to Avinash Jayaram Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s